I was browsing through a local Sam's store a few years ago when I saw an
ETX90-M on sale for $250. I was flabbergasted. It didn't seem that long before
when the ETX-90 had been selling for more like $500.
That time frame was before the computerized ETX models, and only the RA axis
was motorized. I didn't know what an M model was, but I decided that for $250 I
was willing to find out. I found that it was a variation of the ETX 90 RA model.
If you want one of these now, you can find them used on EBAY, but Meade has moved on from that simple and elegant telescope. You can still get something I think is comperable, as handy, and at a similar price. I'm thinking of the
Orion StarMax 90mm TableTop Telescope. No clock drive here, but great optics, super portability and simplicity, just the features I love about my ETX 90.
When I examined my ETX 90 purchase, I was happy to see that the ETX had many
of the features of the venerable Questar, a telescope I'd ogled over almost
annually, but never found the cash to purchase. Of course, for the money, the
Questar is a much finer piece of equipment. Sort of like comparing a Timex, a
perfectly adequate watch, with a luxurious Rolex. But each time I got the
Questar impulse, I would remind myself of the other fine (and larger)
telescopes I could get for the money.
None-the-less, Meade advertised that the ETX had precision optics equal to
any telescope on the market. The incredible price was due to the heavy duty
plastic construction on the ETX mount rather than the polished aluminum of the
Questar, and a more limited ensemble of features.
The sort version of this review is that I find the ETX optics to be of
absolutely top quality, and the mount adequate. The shortcomings can be
inexpensively overcome if one desires. Newer versions all have the
same exemplary optics combined with computerized mounts.
But I learned a lot about the ETX in my observational journeys. If you want
the long version of the review for more information, read on.
My ETX shares in common with the Questar a 3.5 inch Maksutov optical system,
a clock drive on the RA axis, a fork mount with accessory table-top tripod
legs, and a flip mirror with rear eyepiece/accessory port. It also has slow
motion controls on both axes.
The Questar, besides having all these mechanical features in far superior
quality, has in addition a built-in Barlow lens, an ultra-handy finder system
that uses the same eyepiece as the main telescope, a star chart on the barrel
that extends to be a dew guard, and a moon map on the barrel under the star map
The ETX, being a simpler and less expensive piece of gear, has no internal
Barlow, a less handy drive system, and a small (barely useful) finder
On the first evening that I had the ETX, I set it up and peered at Jupiter
and the Galilean moons. I was pleasantly surprised to see the moons appear as
perfectly defined tiny discs. I'd never seen the moons so well defined, having
viewed them generally with Newtonians, which always added a few spikes around
the moons. Jupiter's cloud bands showed clearly, and it was noteworthy that
no color fringes were seen at the planets sharply defined limb.
First impression? The optics were superb.
When I tried the clock drive. I found a few things I didn't care for.
Disappointment one -- my big hands had trouble reaching in between the wide
fork supports to manipulate the RA adjustment and clutch knob. The fork
supports are much thicker than the trim aluminum ones of the Questar, and being
plastic must be so to have the necessary strength.
Disappointment two - After only a few minutes of passable tracking, the
clock drive seemed not to be working at all.
I scoured the manual and rechecked my procedures, and was left with only one
conclusion, the clock drive was not working properly. The clock motor was
either not running, or some component was not engaging or slipping badly.
I also found that the simple straight-through finder telescope was of little
value. It was difficult to bend my head down and peer through the finder, and
it didn't focus well.
To troubleshoot the clock drive on the fork mounted ETX, I carefully removed
the base of the mount to see how the drive worked.
I found that the base was a very simple design. It also seemed different
than what I found described on some Meade ETX telescope websites. I've been
told that the design has changed over the years as Meade tried different
In any event, what I discovered on my ETX 90 model was a small motor with a
brass spur gear that engages a larger (3 inch diameter or so) plastic gear.
When the clutch knob is tightened, the large gear is unable to free wheel, and
thus drives the telescope.
A circuit board acts as a voltage regulator to maintain a constant voltage
on the DC clock drive motor for proper speed control.
Upon examination, I found that the motor in my unit worked properly, but the
spur gear was slipping on the motor shaft. A drop of epoxy solved the problem
As to the finder, after struggling to use the one provided on my ETX I began
to appreciate why Questar came up with their clever design. It's just very
difficult to find room for any kind of finder on such a compact telescope.
To solve my finder problem, I ordered the elbow-finder made for the ETX-125,
and it has worked better. It is still a bit clumsy in that the eyepiece of the
elbow-finder gets in the way of viewing through the telescope eyepiece. One
ETX owner suggested turning the elbow-finder so that the eyepiece sat about 45
degrees from the telescope eyepiece. I followed that advice and it reduced the
To solve the problem of my clumsy big hands trying to work the RA controls,
I concocted an on/off/fast control. Wires run from the inside of the
fork mount base to a small hand-held control box (available from Radio Shack).
On the control box is one toggle switch and two momentary push button
switches. The toggle switch is wired in series with the telescope's original
on/off switch. Thus it simply extends the on/off switch to be more readily
available than the original on the bottom of the base.
One of the momentary button switches is normally on, and is in series with
the on/off switch. When it is pushed, it interrupts power to the motor,
causing the Earth's rotation to allow an object to "catch up".
This procedure doesn't cause the backlash to reappear since the drive was
not mechanically disengaged.
The other momentary button is wired to allow power to bypass the regulating
portion of the circuit board, so it applies full battery power to the motor.
This causes the motor to run at about twice normal speed. The combination of
the two momentary switches gives a fast/slow slewing control to the RA axis.
With this hand-held controller, the telescope is now quite convenient to use,
and is one of my favorite instruments. I've been able to engage in some
astrophotography with the unit now that precise pointing and clock drive
control is available.
The computerized designs now used by Meade actually attack both of my
trouble points, so I would have to say that I'd not hesitate to buy one of the
newer units -- if my old one ever breaks. I must say that with all the plastic
used in the telescope's design, I was concerned that it would not hold up.
Now, years later, I can say that I've had no problems with my ETX 90 RA
Tycho Taken With ETX90
I've used the ETX-90 RA quite a bit now, and have compared it side by side
with my two Newtonians, a 6 inch f/10 DOB and a 6 inch f/5 equatorial. I still
enjoy setting up all of the scopes and comparing views of planets and the
In general, the high resolution views through the ETX are quite
extraordinary. Images are very crisp, making the unit a fine lunar and
planetary performer. There is no noticeable color fringing, and the stubby
design of the telescope and mount delivers steady images. The image of Tycho
crater at left, taken through the ETX, is a good example of the quality of
images it provides.
I generally view through the ETX at about 150 power, but on good nights on
bright objects I can get to 200x. I can see the large-scale features on Mars,
and of course the polar caps.
On Saturn, I can see the lighter color of the equatorial band, and can
clearly see the Cassini division of the rings. I can see about 4 of Saturn's
moons as tiny points of light.
On Jupiter I can see the dark bands nearest the equator, and an additional
dark band in the Northern hemisphere. The Great Red Spot is visible as a light
colored feature. I cannot really see color on Jupiter with my aging eyes.
Jupiter appears as a black and white image.
The moon is a wonderful object with the ETX, especially with the fabricated
hand-held controller. With a twist of the elevation control I can move up and
down along the moon's terminator, and with the push of a button, slew left and
right. Trolling around on the moon is a delight.
When comparing the ETX with the 6 inch telescopes, the ETX holds its own. On
most nights, little more detail is seen on a planet or the moon with the bigger
telescopes than with the ETX. But on good nights, as you would expect, the
bigger telescopes will show more detail.
As to star observing, At first I didn't find this model of ETX all that
useful. The aperture is big enough to show all the Messier objects for example,
as well as hundreds of others. But with the combination of the rather narrow
field of the Maksutov optics and the awkward finder, locating star objects is
very difficult. I'm sure the computerized versions help considerably in making
the ETX a better star telescope.
To address that problem, I developed a program for my HP calculator to aid
with finding star and deep space objects with my telescopes that have setting
circles. The calculator can hold up to a few thousand object coordinates,
provides an easy alignment procedure, and presents a simple menu to select
objects for view. The program accounts for Earth rate, so once the RA axis ring
is set, it's good for the night (of course, some more expensive mounts have
motorized RA setting circles that do this compensation automatically).
I've found that I can use this program quite successfully with the ETX. By
aligning the polar mounted telescope with Polaris and doing the calculator's
alignment procedure (which tells me where to set the RA axis) I find that the
ETX makes a very nice instrument for star observing. The setting circles are
plenty accurate for pointing the telescope. With a 25mm Plossl eyepiece to aid
in locating objects from the calculator supplied coordinates, I find that
nearly every time the object I seek is within the field at first glance.
Now that I have a means of easily finding objects with the ETX, I can report
that it's a surprisingly good instrument for viewing many star objects. It's a
natural for double stars, and even most Messier and other objects show up very
well. The instrument, though modest in size, gives pin point images and offers
high contrast views, thanks to the telescope's internal baffling.
Since modifying the clock drive, I've tried a bit of photography through it.
The drive isn't good enough for long term time exposures of star objects, but
has worked well for photographing the moon and planets. The mount is still a
little idiosyncratic sometimes. I often find that after I mount the telescope
to the tripod wedge, I have to rotate the base to a position where the clock
drive isn't jerky. I have yet to resolve that problem, but I can work around
You can check out the pictures I've taken through the modified ETX at the
ETX photos page on this
Would I recommend the ETX 90 RA? Not as it was when I first purchased it,
but with the refinements -- yes. That said, it is clear that I'd recommend the
newer models, like the Meade
3514-04-20 ETX MAK 90-Millimeter Portable Observatory, AutoStar (Black). The newer ETX 90 models solved my main complaints
in an even more grand fashion by including drive motors on both axes and a
computerized driving system. If your interest is a portable instrument to
augment your equipment arsenal, I think you'd find the ETX90 a great
supplement. If you don't want the computerized model, then keep your eyes on
Ebay for an RA model and get a telescope with superb optics for a bargain.